I know that boredom was the chief reason I've quit fitness and weight loss programs in the past. So I thought I'd dig deeper in to the texture, shape and meaning of my boredom. The other day I found a great video clip that sums up contemporary thinking:
Why do we get bored? By vsauce
The clip inspired me to check out my own boredom level on the BPS scale. It turns out I'm the Rock of Gilbratar, unshakeable, and not prone to boredom at all! I think I am six percent on the boredom scale. Reflecting on the various examples provided in the quiz, I must be darned good at managing boring situations. For example, I figure it is my responsibility to enjoy my work, so I manage it so those moments of flow and enthusiasm happens. I have hobbies. I paint. I knit. I write. I am well-supplied with books. I play my games on my iPhone. If I know I will spend time in a waiting room, a queue, or other situations I am powerless other to sit still, I bring along plenty of things to do.
This time I have adopted similar strategies to push through the grinding boredom of machine exercise, and diarizing all my food (130 days and counting). This time I filled the gaps with apps like myfitnesspal. This little app frees me from manually calculating, providing me with totals, tracking, and graphs effortlessly. To fight boredom on the treadmill, I purchased the accessory and downloaded related apps of Blue Goji. These games only move when I do, and the harder I push, the better my score.
Given my intolerance of boredom and the many ways I avoid it I doubt my problem is low dopamine levels.
If diet and exercise bores me, it is because it is interminable. There is no guarantee, if I stick to the plan, that I would eventually hit that ideal in fitness and trim. I am prometheus, tortured by the capricious gods to have my liver eaten and regenerated forever. I also bore from these activities, as they do not engage my mind. I have received high reward for thinking, so I naturally gravitate to thinking activities to make me feel better. As fine as the endorphin high is, it does not engage my mind. Where is the exquisite pleasure of working out a problem, or crafting words to move people?
The solution seems obvious. I use my creativity to engage in exercises that use both mind and body. Onward I go!
A book to read, Boredom: A Lively History by Peter Toohey.
Once upon a time there was a greek philosopher who, by persistently asking his leaders questions, was nicknamed the "Gnat of Athens". He did not consider it a perjorative. By his example, all of us should from time to time challenge our core beliefs - asking ourselves what moves us to do what we do. If our fundamental principles include "do no harm" and "protect the weak", are our institutions and our own behavior proof to what we believe?
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Friday, February 21, 2014
The Org Chart and the Middle Manager
I am completing the book, "Everything is Miscellaneous" by David Weinberger, surely a must-read for budding records managers, librarians, and big-data affectionados. Before I lose it, I am capturing (from this book) the history of the organization chart, something that has eluded me for fifteen years.
Daniel McCallum drafted the first modern organization chart in 1857, to describe the complex reporting structure for New York and Erie Railroad.
This question of origin and history has haunted me ever since a lawyer asked for the organization charts for Michener Centre dating back to the 1940's. I looked hard enough to say with confidence that if these organization charts were ever made, they do not exist now. I advised that if such a chart was needed, the lawyer would have to pull back individual employee files to reconstruct the reporting relationships. A simple request had become a slog.
So organization charts are a useful business tool, and help clarify relationships. They satisfy an underlying need in all of us for order, clarity. The jungle of existence is cleared away and we have focus and direction. I recommend Weinberger's book to understand how the third order of organization - big data and the cloud - can turn this sense of order on its' head.
This being early morning, my first desire to capture this history (for my own peace of mind) was quickly followed by a recollection of my own working organization chart for the middle manager. I have used this chart many times to explain to colleagues and subordinates how middle managers keep tabs of the "front line" and how we simultaneously reassure executive that all is in order.
Daniel McCallum drafted the first modern organization chart in 1857, to describe the complex reporting structure for New York and Erie Railroad.
The First Organization Chart |
This question of origin and history has haunted me ever since a lawyer asked for the organization charts for Michener Centre dating back to the 1940's. I looked hard enough to say with confidence that if these organization charts were ever made, they do not exist now. I advised that if such a chart was needed, the lawyer would have to pull back individual employee files to reconstruct the reporting relationships. A simple request had become a slog.
So organization charts are a useful business tool, and help clarify relationships. They satisfy an underlying need in all of us for order, clarity. The jungle of existence is cleared away and we have focus and direction. I recommend Weinberger's book to understand how the third order of organization - big data and the cloud - can turn this sense of order on its' head.
This being early morning, my first desire to capture this history (for my own peace of mind) was quickly followed by a recollection of my own working organization chart for the middle manager. I have used this chart many times to explain to colleagues and subordinates how middle managers keep tabs of the "front line" and how we simultaneously reassure executive that all is in order.
I start by drawing in the "front line", the life-blood of the company. These are the workers who have daily contact with the customers. I want my employees to be smiling, because I want my customers to be smiling. Empowered, happy, confident workers are made by great supervisors. The middle manager's job is to mentor, coach, and guide supervisors to be the best they can be at taking good care of those front-line workers.
The second half of the middle manager's job is to report to executive what is going on. They are too far removed from the day-to-day to know themselves if the front line is working and the customers happy. So they broadcast requests for information, and try and scout ahead. The good middle manager keeps executive abreast of what is going on, reporting on successes as well as potential problems before they become too large.
That's it. A little bit of book mining and brain mining. Find ways to be happy-happy, people.
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Obesity, a Complex Disorder
I am going to put forth a thought that obesity is a complex disorder where the resolution is going to involve the complex interplay of several hormonal processes. I recently read Dr. Sharma's blog where he describes persistent weight loss as trying to run down the up escalator.
This fight against our own body's processes reminds me of a battle I had with the thermostat in our old apartment. It was a fancy thing, designed to keep temperature constant between a range of high and low temperatures. It had a flaw however. If temperatures snuck above the high setting, the furnace would blow full blast until it got cooler. Think about that for a minute. Our solution? If it were a cool day, we would open every window in the house in the hopes of beating the furnace. If it was a hot day, we would have to set the thermostat above the ambient temperature. Over the next few days, I would gradually lower the higher setting on the thermostat, as the apartment cooled. It was a trick to fix a flaw.
I have also been thinking of the complex interplay of hormones that regulate hunger and weight. The miracle of insulin was solved when the discoverers realized it has a balanced relationship with glucose. Neither can be too high.
This is a two-way relationship, complex enough to figure out. But what if the relationship between hunger and weight gain were even more complex; two-way, three-way or even more?
With a system that complex, how might we ever disentangle it? There's Cortisol, Leptin, Ghrelin, Insulin, Estrogen and Progesterone. There could be as many as forty hormones involved. It should not be surprising that so many processes are involved in eating, acquiring energy and storing it. Doing this efficiently is critical to our survival. I am reminded of Penfield's bain map.
We dedicate a good many of our resources to this interplay. It's complex, and it's central to our survival.
So again, back to the disentangling. Perhaps this could be mapped out using the new technology that allows us to build analogues of bodily systems; organs on a chip.
If we build a successful analogue that replicates the body's propensity to obesity (at least among a percentage of the population or under certain conditions), we can then more readily test adding or subtracting the various hormones/foods/interplays.
Perhaps the answer will be to add a new artificial organ/hormone, to create a "too high" setting on our thermostat. A trick to fix a flaw in our makeup.
This fight against our own body's processes reminds me of a battle I had with the thermostat in our old apartment. It was a fancy thing, designed to keep temperature constant between a range of high and low temperatures. It had a flaw however. If temperatures snuck above the high setting, the furnace would blow full blast until it got cooler. Think about that for a minute. Our solution? If it were a cool day, we would open every window in the house in the hopes of beating the furnace. If it was a hot day, we would have to set the thermostat above the ambient temperature. Over the next few days, I would gradually lower the higher setting on the thermostat, as the apartment cooled. It was a trick to fix a flaw.
I have also been thinking of the complex interplay of hormones that regulate hunger and weight. The miracle of insulin was solved when the discoverers realized it has a balanced relationship with glucose. Neither can be too high.
This is a two-way relationship, complex enough to figure out. But what if the relationship between hunger and weight gain were even more complex; two-way, three-way or even more?
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=2442789084598877880#editor/target=post;postID=7809158473050261965 | ||||
Nicholas Perony's Bats |
Representation of Penfield's Brain Map |
So again, back to the disentangling. Perhaps this could be mapped out using the new technology that allows us to build analogues of bodily systems; organs on a chip.
If we build a successful analogue that replicates the body's propensity to obesity (at least among a percentage of the population or under certain conditions), we can then more readily test adding or subtracting the various hormones/foods/interplays.
Perhaps the answer will be to add a new artificial organ/hormone, to create a "too high" setting on our thermostat. A trick to fix a flaw in our makeup.
Saturday, February 8, 2014
id Whisperer
Using Haidt's model of intelligence and motivation, how can I influence my "inner elephant" to change old habit patterns?
This "inner elephant" is our inarticulate cognition that directs nearly all our activity. It handles spacial awareness, visual processing, autonomic functions, emotions, and all those things we call "unconscious". Haidt has turned my understanding on its' head. No only is my inarticulate side at least equal to my reasoning, it is running the show. Wherever my elephant heads, that is where I go. My reasoning side is left to chatter away to explain and justify my behavior. At times my reasoning may influence my judgement and intuition, but that is rare.
So if I am undertaking a new habit, I must engage my intuitive side in the process, convincing my ID that this is a useful, charming, and helpful change. It is now dazzlingly clear to me why trying to "tough through it" or beat my self in to submission has limited effect. As soon as my attention is diverted, my elephant is running away!
Also turned on its' head is my old image of ID as dark, mysterious, sexualized (thanks, Freud!) and slightly troubling in its' unknowability. An intelligent and friendly elephant I can relate to. This inexpressive side is not mysterious; it's me!
With these new revelations, might I find new ways to team up with my intuition/ID/elephant, by communicating in a language that it understands? After all, we have horse whisperers and dog whisperers who have dedicated themselves to understanding creatures with an alien and highly physical communication. I am always impressed at how quickly my daughter builds rapport with a dog, by being highly observant and providing a consistent message. Less chatter, and controlled body movements.
I have the added advantage in that I am speaking not to an alien form, but myself. My morals and judgements feel right, because they are my own.
On top of all this, affection is important. Love ourselves and all we've accomplished and give ourselves all the reassurance that new things are possible. Here's a rough list of ways I might communicate with my inner elephant.
I see a re-occurring pattern of declining energy through the week, culminating in an extra-hungry Friday, as I try to use food to increase my energy levels. What might I try to break this pattern?
This "inner elephant" is our inarticulate cognition that directs nearly all our activity. It handles spacial awareness, visual processing, autonomic functions, emotions, and all those things we call "unconscious". Haidt has turned my understanding on its' head. No only is my inarticulate side at least equal to my reasoning, it is running the show. Wherever my elephant heads, that is where I go. My reasoning side is left to chatter away to explain and justify my behavior. At times my reasoning may influence my judgement and intuition, but that is rare.
So if I am undertaking a new habit, I must engage my intuitive side in the process, convincing my ID that this is a useful, charming, and helpful change. It is now dazzlingly clear to me why trying to "tough through it" or beat my self in to submission has limited effect. As soon as my attention is diverted, my elephant is running away!
Also turned on its' head is my old image of ID as dark, mysterious, sexualized (thanks, Freud!) and slightly troubling in its' unknowability. An intelligent and friendly elephant I can relate to. This inexpressive side is not mysterious; it's me!
With these new revelations, might I find new ways to team up with my intuition/ID/elephant, by communicating in a language that it understands? After all, we have horse whisperers and dog whisperers who have dedicated themselves to understanding creatures with an alien and highly physical communication. I am always impressed at how quickly my daughter builds rapport with a dog, by being highly observant and providing a consistent message. Less chatter, and controlled body movements.
I have the added advantage in that I am speaking not to an alien form, but myself. My morals and judgements feel right, because they are my own.
On top of all this, affection is important. Love ourselves and all we've accomplished and give ourselves all the reassurance that new things are possible. Here's a rough list of ways I might communicate with my inner elephant.
- Read confirming authors and have imaginary conversations with them.
- Write Haidt about the implications of his model to instigate permanent habit change. I would also like to describe the connection with coach Wooden's style, who instinctively taught his team that self-esteem comes from integrity.
- Make posters.
- To get moving, chatter less, move more. Move the body, change the demeanor for the few crucial minutes to the new activity. I only have a few moments as my reasoning side is so disractable.
- Afterwards, chatter, reflect after on the positive outcomes, feelings, texture of the new experience. Use a little Buddhist mindfulness to anchor the new experience.
- Find others of like mind for encouragement and support (mind's preference for consensus).
- What if I am an iconoclast, forging new pathways?
- Using my power of rhetoric, bring new converts alongside.
- Never try and beat my will in to submission. Rather, use gentle encouragement. Recall positive outcomes in the past.
I see a re-occurring pattern of declining energy through the week, culminating in an extra-hungry Friday, as I try to use food to increase my energy levels. What might I try to break this pattern?
- Self-care Thursday night? But I did that with no noticeable effect.
- I did recall the positive feelings from the increased exercise, and attempted to duplicate it by exercising at home. Three sets of stairs instead of five (my knees were making crackling noises). Ten minutes instead of twenty on the lifecycle.
- Dry popcorn on hand to get past the initial hunger?
- Caffeine in the morning? Two cups of green tea?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)